Ranjeet Goswami @ Chhanguria v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.54090 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -61 Year- 2000 Thana -BANMANKHI District- PURNIA ====================================================== Ranjeet Goswami @ Chhanguria, Son of Hareram Goswami, Resident of Village - Manna, Police Station - Sarsi, District Purnea. At present resident of Village - Chhatia, Police Station Sadar (Muffasil), District Purnea. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, Adv. Mr. Aarsh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.614 of 2014, arising out of Manmankhi (Sarsi) P.S. Case No.61 of 2000, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/379/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. On earlier two occasions, the petitioner has moved before this Court for bail in Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 44985 of 2013 and 32466 of 2014. Both occasions, this Court has rejected the bail application of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54090 of 2016 (3) dt.08-02-2017 2/2 petitioner is in jail since 26.09.2011.
Looking to the period of custody, let the petitionerRanjeet Goswami @ Chhanguria be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea, in connection with Sessions Trial No.614 of 2014, arising out of Banmankhi (Sarsi) P.S. Case No.61 of 2000 subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/wife/son of the petitioner;
(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;
(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U