Dinesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21888 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2022 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== RAJAN KUMAR Son of Lal Babu Chandrawanshi Resident of village - Dosma, P.S.- Fesar, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22108 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2022 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== DINESH SINGH S/o Rajendra Singh R/o village- Mishir Bigha, Jasoiiya, P.S.- Town Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21888 of 2022) For the Petitioner :
Mr. Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22108 of 2022) For the Petitioner :
Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2022 Since both the cases arise out of Aurangabad Nagar P.S. No. 89 of 2022, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by common order.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21888 of 2022(2) dt.06-05-2022 2/2 These applications for anticipatory bail arises out of Aurangabad Nagar P.S. Case No. 89 of 2022 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
The petitioners have been named by co-accused Ramji Ram, who was caught when the police raided New Mahadev Hotal where liquor was being unloaded. The petitioner -Dinesh Singh has three criminal antecedents of similar nature whereas, petitioner - Rajan Kumar is the owner of New Mahadev Hotel.
Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, these anticipatory bail applications are dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T