Vinay Kumar Bharti @ Mithilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52558 of 2016 (3) dt.17-01-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52558 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -310 Year- 2015 Thana -ARA NAWADA District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Vinay Kumar Bharti @ Mithilesh Kumar Son of Late Kishun Singh Resident of Village - Pakari, P.S. - Fatehpur, District - Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in jail custody since 16.09.2016 in connection with Arrah Nawada P.S. Case No. 310 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire case is based on CCTV footage at ATM of the Union Bank of India on the date of occurrence and subsequently, the petitioner was made to confess his guilt. It is further submitted that such withdrawals to the tune of two lakhs in two days has not been possible and the petitioner is not put on T.I. Parade. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioner and that the confessional statement of the accused made before the police has no evidentiary value, let the petitioner above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52558 of 2016 (3) dt.17-01-2017 named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arrah in connection with Arrah Nawada P.S. Case No. 310 of 2015.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T