Sunil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No 12531 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -271 Year- 2015 Thana -SARAIYA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Sunil Singh, Son of Ram Vinay Singh, Resident of Village- Vishunpur Pandey wrongly mentioned in FIR as Vishunupur Pandey, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr S N P Sinha, Sr Advocate with Mr Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Saraiya Police Station Case No 271 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner and his name transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused who was arrested at the spot. It is further submitted that petitioner is accused in one another case but that is under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12531 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017 2/2 circumstances stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya Police Station Case No 271 of 2015 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T