Jayjay Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13649 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -282 Year- 2016 Thana -RAJAUN District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Jayjay Ram, Son of Bhajjo Ram,
2. Bhavisan Ram @ Bibhishan Ram, S/o Bhajjo Ram,
3. Jugal Ram, S/o Bhajjo Ram, All Resident of Village- Khiddi, Police Station- Rajoun, District- Banka.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Umanath Mishra (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 282 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 498A, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Lalita Devi the daughter of the informant was married to Nandu Ram twelve years ago and for the last two years the husband and his relative Kanhai Ram are torturing mentally to the daughter of the informant several times. The informant tried to pacify the matter but they used to assault her for petty matter, out of the wedlock there is two sons and one daughter and allegedly she was killed and her dead body was thrown in the well and then
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13649 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 the informant went there and found no one present in the house. The dead body was pulled out from the well and accordingly the case was registered against the petitioners also. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioners have got no concern with the family affairs of the deceased and her husband, they are living at their houses since long having no concern with the deceased and her husband, there is no specific allegation against the petitioners and, as such, they deserve sympathetic consideration.
The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail by submitting that petitioners are maternal father-in-law of the deceased.
In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 282 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T