Ramji Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.143 of 2014 =========================================================== Ramji Chauhan, S/o Late Jagarnath Chauhan, Resident of Village- Dalan, Police Station- Katihar Muffasil, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The District Superintendent of Police, Katihar
3. King Kundan, son of Sudarshan Mandal, Station Head Officer, Katihar Muffasil, Police Station, District- Katihar
4. Dinanath Singh S/o Late Ram Sagar Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Laliahi, P.S.- Katihar, District- Katihar
5. Kisto Ravidas S/o Late Dheku Ravidas, Resident of Village- Kadaipura Kaloli, P.S.- Katihar Muffasil, District- Katihar
6. Jhulanand Chaudhary S/o Late Khublal Chaudhary, Resident of VillageRupaspur, P.S.- Rowtara, District- Katihar
7. Ram Babu Singh, son of Raj Kishore Singh, Assistant Sub - Inspector, Muffasil Police Station, District- Katihar
8. Vijay Kumar Manjhi, son of Gopal Krishna Manjhi, Assistant Sub - Inspector, Muffasil Police Station, District- Katihar .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birednera Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GP-22 Mr. Praveen Kumar, AC to GP-22 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-01-2015 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.143 of 2014 dt.16-01-2015 2 / 3 State. Let the same be kept on record.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In the present application filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the First Information Report of Katihar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 4 of 2014 dated 8.1.2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 384, 406 and 504 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as for quashing of Katihar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 8 of 2014 dated 18.1.2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 506 and 504 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(1)(x) of the SC & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
It has been contended that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in both the cases due to ongoing land dispute between the parties.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has submitted that in Katihar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 4 of 2014 after concluding the investigation, the police have already submitted charge sheet in the Court and investigation in connection with Katihar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 8 of 2014 is going on. I have perused the FIR of both the cases mentioned
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.143 of 2014 dt.16-01-2015 3 / 3 hereinabove. The allegations made in both the FIRs do constitute a cognizable offence.
In that view of the matter, I find no merit in the present application. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T