← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7647/2020withdrawn

Roy Raj Kamal Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-07Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7647 of 2020 ====================================================== Roy Raj Kamal Sinha Son of Late Bijay Kumar Sinha Resident of MohallaHarnichak, Shiv Nagar near Satya Gas Godown, P.S.- Beur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Dept of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Chief Executive Officer, the State Health Society, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Executive Director, the State Health Society, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Additional Executive Director, the State Health Society, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The State Health Society, Bihar, Patna through its authorised person. 7.

The Regional Additional Director, the State Health Society, Bihar, Patna. Respondent nos. 3 to 7 Parivaar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna. 8.

Urmila International Services Private Limited, through its Director, having its office at 31/A 1st Floor, Bankey BihariSadan, S.K. Puri, Boring Road, Patna.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Resp. No. 8 :

Mr. Mr. Rajesh Ranjan No. 1, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 07-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner appears and seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7647 of 2020(6) dt.07-10-2021 2/2

3. Permission is accorded. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U