Raju Uraon v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43342 of 2016 (2) dt.06-10-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43342 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2016 Thana -GOBARDHANA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Raju Uraon Son of Ramu Uraon, Resident of Village- Hariharpur, P.S.- Gobardhana, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, and 26 of the Arms Act. Allegation has been made that petitioner has killed the forest buffalo and police has recovered arms which was used for killing the forest buffalo.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner, Raju Uraon, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with T.R. No.4418 of 2016, arising out of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43342 of 2016 (2) dt.06-10-2016 Goberdhana P.S. Case No. 8 of 2016, subject to the conditions that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. father, mother, wife or son (ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order including cancellation of bail (iii) petitioner shall mark his presence before the nearest police station by 7th of every month fill six months and (iv) petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

Vinay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U T