Patna High CourtMJC/3332/2011disposed

Ramji Pd. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-10The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3332 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4062 of 2010 ====================================================== Ramji Prasad, S/o Late Sri Budhdeo Prasad, R/o House No. 78, Gandhi Path North, S.K.Puri (South Nehru Nagar), P.O & P.S- Patliputra, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Mr. Anup Mukherji, The Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. Mr. Dipak Kumar, The Principal Secretary Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department,Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr Ajay Kumar Choudhary, The Joint Secretary Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Govt Of Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Arbind Kumar Sinha, The Deputy Secretary Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

5. Mr. Umesh Kumar, The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Magadh Range, Patna.

6. Mr. I.D.S.D. Dhaliwal, The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the State :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, A.C. to G.A. 12 For Accountant General :

Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 10-11-2017 Seeking compliance of an order passed by the Writ Court on 24.09.2010 in C.W.J.C. No. 4062 of 2010 this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt. The order passed in the writ petition on 24.09.2010 was challenged by the State Government by filing an appeal before this Court being L.P.A. No. 1001 of 2011 and by an order passed on 07.09.2017 a Division Bench of this Court has allowed the L.P.A. filed by the State Government and has set

Patna High Court MJC No.3332 of 2011(4) dt.10-11-2017 2/2 aside the order passed by the Writ Court and liberty has been granted to the petitioner herein to file a representation or appeal before the competent authority.

Accordingly, now in view of the aforesaid order passed in the L.P.A., no further indulgence into the matter is called for. The petitioner may work out his relief now based on the rights and liabilities imposed on the parties vide order dated 07.09.2017 passed in L.P.A. No. 1001 of 2011. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.