Phucho Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8529 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2015 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Phucho Singh, Son of Late Bal Govind Singh, Resident of VillageJamera, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 150 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against the petitioner and others is that police on information raided and seized huge quantity of petroleum and kerosene oils and, thereafter, police raided one button factory, from where 560 litres of Kerosene oil and other articles were recovered and it is alleged that the said factory belonged to petitioner, however, not even a single chit of paper has been produced showing that the said factory belonged to petitioner. Petitioner has clean antecedent and has nothing to do with the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8529 of 2017 (4) dt.07-04-2017 2/3 alleged offence and the said factory from which the alleged recovery has been made, did not belong to petitioner and other coaccused person, having similar allegation, has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail vide order dated 21.07.2015, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 27063 of 2015. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that other coaccused person, having similar allegation has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, as such, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Begusarai in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

This is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8529 of 2017 (4) dt.07-04-2017 3/3 (ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T