Md. Sahid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.69815 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2018 Thana- MEHANDIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Sahid Son of Md. Jabir @ Md. Jafir Resident of Village-Shekha Ka Roja,Renter in House of Munni Khala,P.S.-Khajekalan,Distt.-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2018 Heard the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Mehandiganj P.S.Case No.64 of 2018 registered under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the I.P.C. Allegation against the petitioner is of attempt to commit theft in the house of the informant and he was caught at the place of occurrence and from his possession Rs.500/- was recovered and thereafter he was handed over to the police. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been implicated in this case due to enmity and he is in custody since 08.08.2018 having no criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69815 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/2 each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Patna City, in Mehandiganj P.S. Case No.64/18 subject to the conditions that (I) Bailors must be of local having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned (ii) petitioner/s shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/their bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below and (iii) if the petitioner/s tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner/s.
(S. Kumar, J) aks/- U