Sambhavana A Social Organization v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.199 of 2014 ====================================================== 'Sambhayana' a Social Organization, Ashok Bajpayee's House, Naya Tola, Bihari, P.O. + P.S. + District- Jamui through its Secretary, Anilesh Chandra Mishra Son of Suresh Chandra Mishra Resident of Village- Mishradih P.S.- Sikandara District- Jamui .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Collector cum-District Magistrate, Jamui District- Jamui
4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Jamui District- Jamui
5. The District Superintendent of Education cum-District Education Officer cum District Program Co-Ordinator, Jamui District- Jamui
6. The District Program Officer, Primary Education Jamui District- Jamui
7. The Executive Engineer-cum Secretary, District Water and Cleanliness Committee, Jamui District- Jamui
8. The Executive Engineer, Public Health & Engineering Department, Jamui District- Jamui .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Ashish Kumar Lal, AC to GA 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-10-2015 None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.
2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the claim of the petitioner with regard to construction of two units of lavatories in 27 schools is a disputed question of fact in view of which the present writ petition is not maintainable. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not complied with the direction of this Court dated 02.02.2015 requiring the production of the relevant document showing recommendation of the School
Patna High Court CWJC No.199 of 2014 (3) dt.27-10-2015 2/2 Education Committee with the C.D. relating to such construction.
3. Be that as it may, in view of the non-appearance, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U