← Library
Patna High CourtC.R./91/2015withdrawn

Babu Lal Yadav @ Singh And ORS v. Bechan Ahir And ORS

2015-09-07Mr. Justice V. Nath2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Revision No.91 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Babu Lal Yadav @ Singh.

2. Baban Yadav @ Singh.

3. Dadan Yadav @ Singh.

4. Madan yadav @ Singh, all are sons of late Sheo Nath Singh, resident of village Bhabua Town P.S. Bhabua, District-Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Bechan Ahir son of late Kailash Singh.

2. Jir Kalia Kuer wife of late Ram Awatar Singh.

3. Raj Nath Singh.

4. Natuni Singh.

5. Sheopujan Singh.

6. Ram Nagina Singh all 3 to 6 are sons of late Ram Awatar singh.

7. Jai prakash Singh.

8. Om Prakash Singh.

9. Sanjay Singh.

10. Pintu Singh.

11. Yudhisthar Singh all 7 to 11 sons of Raj Nath Singh.

12. Most Chandi Kuer wife of late Santan Singh Resident of Villagebhabua Town ward No. 13 P.S. Bhabhua District-Kaimur.

13. Shakila Devi wife of Bibhuti Yadav, Resident of village-Sherpur P.s. Chainpur District-Kaimur.

14. Shushila Devi wife of Ram Mohan Yadav, resident of Bharkhar at present village-Kalaura P.S. Chand District-Kaimur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arabind Nath Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 07-09-2015 Mr. Arabind Nath Pandey, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, in response to the objection

Patna High Court C.R. No.91 of 2015 (2) dt.07-09-2015 to the maintainability of this revision application as pointed out by the stamp reporter, has prayed for permission to withdraw this revision application with liberty to file misc. appeal in accordance with law against the impugned order.

The prayer is allowed.

The revision application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty to the petitioners.

(V. Nath, J) Devendra/- U