Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32417 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2020 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
VIJAY YADAV Son of Late Laxman Yadav Resident of Village- Baluwa Rampurwa, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran. 2.
Rajdeo Kumar Son of Makun Yadav Resident of Village- Baluwa Rampurwa, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran. 3.
Rajan Kumar Son of Makun Yadav Resident of Village- Baluwa Rampurwa, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran.
4.
Makun Yadav Son of Late Shankar Yadav Resident of Village- Baluwa Rampurwa, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran. 5.
Raju Yadav Son of Makun Yadav Resident of Village- Baluwa Rampurwa, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar No 7 For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case no. 282 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution story relates to abuse and assault to the informant by means of lathi and danda by the petitioners and other co-accused persons.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32417 of 2021(2) dt.22-02-2022 2/2 has submitted that petitioners are is innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both parties have received injuries in alleged occurrence. They have got no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case no. 282 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Bettiah, West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T