Kalu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.69777 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2018 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Kalu Paswan, Son of Deepak Paswan, Resident of Village- Naya Tola, Jurabganj, P.S. Kordha, Distt.-Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Rajgir P.S. Case No. 215 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant, who is the police officer, has alleged that during the vehicle checking, three miscreants on two motorcycles were asked to stop but they started fleeing away and, thereafter, they were chased and apprehended. They failed to produce any ownership of the vehicles and, as such, the same was seized by the police.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. No recovery has been made from him. He has nothing to do with the seized

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69777 of 2018(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 motorcycles. Petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 215 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T