Surya Lal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22158 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2018 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
SURYA LAL MAHTO Son of Chaudhry Mahto Resident of Village-Kushail, P.S-Pupri, District-Sitamarhi.
2.
Ram Lakhan Mahto Son of Nathuni Mahto Resident of Village-Kushail, P.SPupri, District-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dinesh Jha For the State :
Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Pupri P.S. Case No. 178 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is evident from the FIR that some dispute in respect of the land is the reason behind the occurrence. The informant and the accused persons are the agnates.
Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, is correct in his submission that the allegation of assault is general and omnibus.
Considering the above submission, this application is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22158 of 2019(2) dt.09-04-2019 2/2 allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 178 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) HR/- U T