Arbind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13095 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -193 Year- 2015 Thana -SURYAGARHA District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Arbind Yadav, S/o Bino Yadav, resident of Village- Bariyarpur, Police Station- Bariyarpur, District Munger, at present Village- Barhna, P.S.- Suryagarha, District- Lakhisarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 193 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 385 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

The petitioner and 13 others named in First Information Report used to demand of rangdari to the tune of Rs.2,00,000/- from the informant and as the said demand was refused, the accused persons assaulted the brother of the informant, namely, Chandan Tanti and when his brother, namely, Sunil Tanti who came to save him. The accused persons also assaulted, snatched his mobile and shot fire in the air to create terror.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that all the injuries are simple in nature caused by hard blunt substance. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13095 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 petitioner and the informant are resident of the same locality and the occurrence took place on account of high handedness of the informant and his men. The petitioners have wrongly been implicated in the present case. He further submits that other eleven co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail on 05.11.2015 by the learned Sessions Judge. It is the petitioner against whom there is no specific allegation.

On the other hand learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer of the petitioner.

Considering the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be admitted on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 193 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) Mahesh/- U T