Dukha Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24533 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2025 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.
Dukha Ansari Son of Usman Ansari Resident of Vill- Afzala Tole Khewa, P.S.- Biraul, District- Darbhanga 2.
Raushan Khatoon @ Anisha Khatoon Wife of Dukha Ansari Resident of Vill- Afzala Tole Khewa, P.S.- Biraul, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 303(2) of BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant alleges that his minor daughter was kidnapped by the accused persons and accordingly, the informant went to the house of the petitioners to inquire when son-in-law of the petitioners disclosed that victim has left with his brother-in-law i.e. son of the petitioners. It is next submitted that since petitioners are parents of Tamanna Ansari with whom the victim is alleged to have fled, as such, the informant falsely implicated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24533 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 them. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the victim while leaving the house with Tamanna also took money and ornaments. It is further submitted that victim came back and her statement was recorded under Section 183 BNSS, but then she has not alleged anything against the petitioners.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Biraul (Biroul) P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T