← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22566/2022allowed

Randhir Paswan @ Randhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-25Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22566 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2020 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== RANDHIR PASWAN @ RANDHIR KUMAR Son of Ramvinesh Paswan Resident of Village - Dighi, P.s.- Bathnaha, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366A, 34 of the IPC. Allegedly, the petitioner is said to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. It is submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22566 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 2/2 there is no witness to support the allegation that the petitioner has took away the victim forcibly. The real fact is that the petitioner had love affair with the victim and they fled away on their will and solemnized marriage. At present they are living together as husband and wife and have a baby. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No.221/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T