Patna High CourtCWJC/8127/2011disposed

Jyotish Kumar Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-19The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8127 of 2011 ===========================================================

1. Jyotish Kumar Bhagat S/O Late Ram Prasad Bhagat Suspended Rajswa Karmchari, R/O Goshala, Katihar, P.O. - Deharia, Distt. - Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea

4. The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea

5. The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Katihar

6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar

7. The Additional Collector, Katihar Cum The Enquiry Officer Of The Departmental Proceeding Of The Petitioner

8. The District Establishment Deputy Collector, Katihar

9. The Block Development Officer, Balrampur, Distt. - Katihar

10. The Block Development Officer, Katihar

11. The Executive Engineer, N.R.E.P.K., Katihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indu Bhushan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. MD. Nasarool Hoda Khan, SC 1 Ms. Babita Kumari, AC to SC 1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-08-2017 This petition was filed in the year 2011 i.e. on 5.5.2011 wherein, at that point of time, the grievance of the petitioner was that a departmental enquiry against him is progressing and in the departmental enquiry certain documents sought for by him are not being granted. Challenging the proceedings in the departmental enquiry to the extent of non-grant of document, the writ petition was filed. However, now from the counter affidavit filed by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.8127 of 2011 dt.19-08-2017 2/2 respondents, it is seen that the departmental enquiry has been concluded and punishment has also been imposed upon the petitioner. That being so, now this petition, which was filed during the pendency of the enquiry, has been rendered infructuous. The petitioner may challenge the final order passed in the departmental enquiry after its conclusion.

With the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner, this application is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 24.8.2017 Transmission Date N/A