Bhakka Chaudhari @ Bhaakha Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21256 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2019 Thana- BUDDHACOLONY District- Patna ====================================================== BHAKKA CHAUDHARI @ BHAAKHA CHAUDHARI, S/o Tufani Chaudhari, R/o Purvi Tola Buddha Colony, P.O.- Buddha Colony, P.S.- Buddha Colony, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sayed Imran Ghani For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Buddha Colony P.S. Case No. 74 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Prosecution story is that police on information raided the place and and recovered 350 litres of liquor and petitioner fled away.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing has been recovered either from his conscious possession or from his house and he has been named only on the basis of suspicion and there is nothing on record as to what was the source of information to the police and petitioner has no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21256 of 2019(2) dt.09-05-2019 2/2 criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Buddha Colony P.S.Case No. 74 of 2019, corresponding to Special (Excise) Case No. 2191 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T