← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24651/2025allowed

Sachitanand Singh @ Sachchidanand Singh @ Sachidanand Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-02Mr. Justice Harish Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24651 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sachitanand Singh @ Sachchidanand Singh @ Sachidanand Singh Son of Late Anil Kumar Singh R/O Mohalla- Subhai South Tola, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. M. K. Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025 Heard

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Hazipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 324(4), 352 and 109 of the BNS, 2023.

3. On the fateful day, while the petitioner was forcefully cutting the jack fruit tree, which was planted behind the house of the informant and when the same was protested, whereupon, the petitioner allegedly gave an iron rod blow over the head of the informant due to which he sustained serious injuries.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that in fact on account of some land dispute a scuffle took place resulting into injuries to the persons of both sides. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24651 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/3 petitioner and the informant are none else but the own gotiyas. The injury which is allegedly sustained to the informant is found to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance and as such, there is no application of Section 109 of the BNS is the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. It is lastly contended that the petitioner is the person of fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the investigation and the proceeding of the court.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposes the bail application.

6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the nature of injury and the genesis of the occurrence, coupled with the fair antecedent, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hazipur in connection with Hazipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24651 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 3/3 condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U T