Karu Das @ Rajesh Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24430 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui ====================================================== Karu Das @ Rajesh Das Son of Dhaneshwar Das Resident of VillageBishanpur, (Madhopur), P.S.- Chandramandi, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjeet Patel, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chandramandi P.S. Case No.179 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 14.09.2025 at 10 PM, the petitioner along with others arrived and started abusing and assaulting the husband of the informant with fist. It is specifically alleged that this petitioner has assaulted with leg on hydrocele of the informant's husband. He was rushed to hospital and on 16.09.2025 he succumbed to the injuries.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the occurrence is of 14.09.2025,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24430 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 the FIR was lodged on 16.09.2025 and from perusal of the postmortem report it will transpire that the doctor conducting autopsy of the deceased has found following injuries:- "Abdomen stomach ruptured and intestine ruptured".
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR itself it is clear that the petitioner was not armed with any weapon and the allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted with his leg. This goes to show that the petitioner was not having any intention to kill the deceased. There is delay in filing of the FIR and as the petitioner was not armed with any weapon, this shows his intention. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 06.10.2025.
6. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Chandramandi P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24430 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 No.179 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T