Dhruv Narayan Verma @ Dhruw Narayan Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27656 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2018 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Dhruv Narayan Verma @ Dhruw Narayan Verma Son of Late Rajbali Prasad Resident of Village - Sansarpur, P.S.- Bhorey, Distt - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Mostt. Prabhawati Devi Wife of Late Singasan Sah Resident of Village - Musahari Bazar, P.S.- Vijayipur, Distt - Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nityanand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 30-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Vijayipur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner in collusion with other accused persons got the name of Jai Narayan Sah entered in the revenue record over property in question deleting the name of its owner, namely, Singhasan Kanu.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no concern with the aforesaid occurrence. He happens to be mere

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27656 of 2019(2) dt.30-04-2019 2/2 revenue employee and he has only issued the receipt. He has played no role in the mutation of the name of Jai Narayan Sah over the property in question. Moreover it is civil nature case and in respect of property in question, Title Suit bearing Title Suit No. 561 of 2017 is pending in the court below. Co-accused, namely, Bridhi Chand Gupta @ Bridhi Chandra Gupta and another have been enlarged on anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.03.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6697 of 2019.

On the other hand, learned APP opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Vijayipur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T