Amit Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12593 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -684 Year- 2014 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Amit Kumar Gupta Son of Latge Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, Resident of Binodpur, Kalibari, P.S. Kaitihar, P.S. District Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 684 of 2014 registered for offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the First Information Report and the main allegation is against one co-accused Raju Sah, who has already been granted bail vide order dated 09.07.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14789 of 2015 and another co-accused is similar to the petitioner, has also been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.03.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 9980 of 2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that other

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12593 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2017 2/2 co-accused persons similar to the petitioner, have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 684 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

and further subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court and the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine rhyme or reasons, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail.