← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18498/2011dismissed

M/S A.K.Construction v. The Indian Railway And ORS

2016-03-10Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.18498 of 2011 (5) dt.10-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18498 of 2011 ======================================================

1. M/S A.K. Construction Through Its Proprietor, Ashit Kumar Son Of Ram Deni Rani Resident Of Mohalla Magardahi Ward-29, Under Samastipur Municipal Area, Police Station-Samastipur, District-Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Indian Railways, Ministry Of Rail, Rail Bhawan Through Its Secretary.

2. General Manager, Fast Central Railway, Hazipur, District Vaishali.

3. Chief Engineer (Co-Ordination) East Central Railway, Hazipur.

4. S.D.J.M. (Vigilance), East Central Railway, Hazipur.

5. The Divisional Railway Manager, Samastipur Division East Central Railway, District-Samastipur.

6. Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-Ordination) Samastipur Divsion, East Central Railway, District-Samastipur.

7. Senior Divisional Engineer (Special) Samastipur Divsion, East Central Railway, District-Samastipur.

8. Senior Divisional Engineer Iii, Samastipur Divsion, East Central Railway, District-Samastipur.

9. Senior Divisional Finance Manager, Samastipur Divsion, East Central Railway, District-Samastipur.

10. Assistant Divisional Engineer, Easr Central Railways, Saharsa.

11. Senior Section Engineer (Works) East Central Railways.

12. Inspector Of Works East Central Railways. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyam Nandan Choudhary, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Bijay Kumar Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-03-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction in the matter and is accordingly not in a position to press the writ petition.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, states on instruction that the grievance of the petitioner already stands redressed which has been acknowledged by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.18498 of 2011 (5) dt.10-03-2016 petitioner in his letter dated 08.08.2012.

3. Having regard to the stand of the parties, the writ petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U