Kara Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.78263 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2018 Thana- MOKAMA RAIL P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Kara Mahto, (19 years), S/o Feku Mahto, Village, Simriaghat Bind Toli, P.S., Chakiya, District, Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satrudhan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Mokama (Hathidah) Rail P.S. Case No. 19/2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 /414 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant has alleged that while he was coming on train from Howrah, a bag containing one golden ring, Rs.5,000/- silver Payol and mobile was stolen by some unknown thieves. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Two mobiles have been recovered from his possession which are not the stolen mobile. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 16.06.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78263 of 2018(2) dt.17-01-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway Patna in connection with Mokama (Hathidah) Rail P.S. Case No. 19/2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T