Md. Israfil v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7637 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Israfil Son of Late Md. Nasiruddin, resident of Village Makhanpur, P.O. Narayanpur, P.S. Barahat, District- Banka.

2.

Md. Kafil Ahmad Son of Late Md. Nasiruddin, resident of Village Makhanpur, P.O. Narayanpur, P.S. Barahat, District- Banka. 3.

Md. Arfat, Son of Md. Kausar, Resident of Village Kaithatikar, P.O.- Narayanpur, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka.

4.

Md. Nasimun Nazar Son of Md. Mustakim, Resident of Village- Vikrampur, P.O.- Parsa, P.S.- Parsa, District- Godda (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Special Director, Secondary Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Education Officer, Banka.

4.

The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Videyapati Marg Patna through its Secretary.

5.

That Secretary Bihar State Madarsas Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

6.

That Chairman, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

7.

The Managing Committee of the Madarsa Islamia Kaithatikar P.O. Narayanpur, P.S. Barahat, District Banka, through its Secretary Md. Sohrab. 8.

The Managing Committee of Madarsa Islamia Kaitha Tikar, P.O. Narayanpur, P.S. Barahat, District-Banka, through its Secretary Md. Arshad Hussain.

9.

The Maulvi of Madarsa Islamia Kithar tikar P.O. Narayanpur, P.S. Barahat, Distt. Banka.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the Madarsa Board :

Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, Advocate Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra, SC-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed and therefore,

Patna High Court CWJC No.7637 of 2019(6) dt.13-10-2025 2/2 the present writ petition has become infructuous. As such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Ajit Kumar, J) Shahnawaz/- U