Vicky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20820 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2024 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vicky Kumar S/o Nawal Sah R/o of Village and Post- Ishmilepur, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rajesh kumar Sah, S/O- Dilip Sah Vill- Ishmailpur, P.S.- Hajipur, DistrictVaishali ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Sweety Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 Heard Ms. Sweety Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Both the parties i.e. petitioner and daughter of the informant (victim) have appeared, suo moto, before this Court.
3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hajipur (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 11.03.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. According to prosecution case, informant alleges that on 09.03.2024 his daughter had left home for the High School and when she did not return in evening, then the informant came to know that the petitioner along with other co-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20820 of 2025(3) dt.04-07-2025 2/3 accused persons had conspired together and kidnapped the informant's daughter.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case and in fact, the petitioner was in love with the victim.
6. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the complainant is present in the Court and the complainat herself stated that she and the petitione have performed the marriage on 11.03.2025 in Gurgaon and she is living with the petitioner as his wife with full honour and dignity and both have been blessed with a male child.
7. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur at Vaishali in connection with Hajipur (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2024,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20820 of 2025(3) dt.04-07-2025 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and with other following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Jyoti Kumari/- U T