Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52042/2016dismissed

Pramod Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52042 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -70 Year- 2016 Thana -PAKARIBARAW District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Pramod Singh Son of Bimal Singh, Resident of Village- Lilo, P.S. Pakariwarma, District- Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aaruni Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 05.05.2016 in connection with Pakariwarama P.S. Case No. 70 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case due to election dispute and it is alleged that 80 cartridges were recovered from the petitioner, however the petitioner has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has remained in judicial custody for than ten months. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that in this case there is recovery of eighty cartridges and on examination they were found unused coupled with the fact that the petitioner has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52042 of 2016 (5) dt.03-03-2017 2/2 criminal antecedent as he is accused in as many as nine other case, as such, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner, the privilege of regular bail, at this stage, it is accordingly rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of six months and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below itself, which will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U