Ratnesh Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.79010 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2018 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ratnesh Tiwari S/o Bhavanath Tivari R/vill-Kushiharapur Ramani, P.SKanti,Distt.-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikram Jeet For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 154 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that from her saving bank account Rs. 40,000/- was transferred in the saving bank account of Ram Udagar Singh fraudulently.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR nor he is beneficiary of such transaction. He has been implicated in this case only on the basis of self confession.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79010 of 2018(2) dt.30-01-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 11th , Motihari, in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 154 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T