Guria Devi @ Sangeeta Devi@Sageeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75571 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2018 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== GURIA DEVI @ SANGEETA DEVI @ SAGEETA DEVI Wife of Raj Kumar Singh,D/o Harendra Singh @ Harendra Prasad Resident of Village-Gobarsahi Dumri Majhaulia Khetal,Ganga Nagar,Gali No.1,Post-Dumri,P.S. Sadar,Distt.-Muzaffarpur.At present residing at A-279, Durga Gali,Mandawali,Fazalpur,New Delhi-110092 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Shukla, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Kanhaiya Kishore (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 405 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant who is father of the deceased has alleged that petitioner along with his family members killed his daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she is innocent and has committed no offence. she has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is sister-in-law of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75571 of 2018(2) dt.18-12-2018 2/2 deceased. Petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2018. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 405 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T