Surendra Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.664 of 2014 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6340 of 2007 =========================================================== Surendra Kumar Choudhary son of Late Jhulan Choudhary resident of Mohalla Moghal Pura, P.O. Jhauganj, P.S.- Khajekala, District Patna .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Employment and Training, Bihar, Patna
2. The Director, Department of Employment and Training, Bihar, Patna
3. The Assistant Director, Sub-Regional Employment Exchange, Bhagalpur
4. The Accountant General (A AND E), Bihar, Birchand Patel Path,Patna
5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Bhagalpur
6. Smt. Ram Pari Devi wife of Late Jhulan Choudhary resident of MohallaMoghalpura, Purani Chaoki, P.O. Patna City, District Patna
7. Smt. Savitri Devi wife of Late Jhulan Choudhary resident of Mohalla Mohiuddin Nagar, P.O. Mirjan Hat District- Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance:
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Md. Fazal Rahman, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, AC to SC-16. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 22-09-2016 The appellant is the son from the first wife of the deceased who was a government servant. The deceased government servant married thrice during his lifetime and there are disputes with regard to inheritance between his wives and their children. The learned Single Judge has rightly observed that the parties are free to fight the battle in a Civil Court for declaration in their favour.
Patna High Court LPA No.664 of 2014 dt.22-09-2016 2/2 Learned counsel for the appellant points out that certain legal heirs have applied for succession certificate. Be as it may, it is open to the appellant to avail such remedy as is available to him, but no direction can be issued that the appellant should invoke any particular line of action. We do not find any error in the order passed by the learned Single Bench. Accordingly, the present Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed.
(Hemant Gupta, J) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Mishra/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 29.09.2016 Transmission Date