Patna High CourtCWJC/22384/2014dismissed

Naresh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-06-26Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22384 of 2014 =========================================================== Naresh Prasad, son of Late Kali Sao, resident of Mohalla: Sonar Patti, P.S: Nawada Town, District: Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Education Department , Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Nawada.

3. The District Education Officer, Nawada.

4. The District Programme Officer, Nawada. null null

5. The Inspector General of Police, Vigilance, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Nawada.

7. The Thana Incharge, Govindpur P.S. Nawadah.

8. The Principal, Project Girls Inter School, Govindpur, District: Nawada

9. Anita Kumari, wife of Bharat Bhushan, resident of village & P.O: Govindpur, P.S: Govindpur, district: Nawada,at present working as Assistant Teacher, Project Girls Inter School, Govindpur, Nawada.

10. Smt. Sushila Devi, wife of Late Parmeshwar Singh, resident of Village: Govindpur, P.S: Govindpur, District: Nawada, at present posted as Peon, Project Girls Inter School, Govindpur, Nawada.

11. Suraj PrasadSao, son of Late Kishun Sao, resident of Village: Govindpur, P.S: Govindpur, District: Nawada.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP30- RAJU GIRI =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-06-2015 *************** 26.06.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has already set the law in motion in one to many forums. No further confusion is required to be add up by the High Court by passing any kind of order for many a reason, including the fact that those

Patna High Court CWJC No.22384 of 2014 dt.26-06-2015 2/2 proceeding will get prejudiced because of any observation of the High Court.

Writ application stands dismissed, accordingly.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/- U