Golu Kumar @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27008 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2024 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Golu Son of Rama Ray Resident of Village- Bankerwa, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 133 of 2024, dated 17.04.2024, lodged under Sections 457 & 380 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution, an FIR has been lodged against one named and one unknown accused person, alleging that at midnight, when the informant woke up on hearing the noise of thieves and raised an alarm, the thieves ran away, but one of them was apprehended. One country-made pistol, two live cartridges, along with other articles, were recovered from the apprehended person.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27008 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel further submits that the petitioner's name has figured in this case by virtue of the confessional statement of the apprehended accused person. Counsel further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Counsel further submits that, though in the rejection order certain materials have been mentioned, in the case diary there is nothing adverse against the petitioner. Counsel further submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean, as one criminal case is pending against him, but that case relates to an excise matter in which he is on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean.

6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-IX, Saran at Chapra in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 133 of 2024, subject to the conditions as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27008 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 3/3 laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner shall desist from committing such type of criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T