← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22446/2022bail granted

Sushil Rai @ Sushil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-05Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22446 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2020 Thana- KANHAULI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SUSHIL RAI @ SUSHIL YADAV Son of Ramvriksha Ray Resident of Village - Larkawa, P.S.- Kanhauli, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 1080 litres of liquor from bathroom of one Vinod Rai.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, the recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and he came to be implicated at the instance of local chowkidar with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22446 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 2/2 whom he is on an inimical term.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kanhauli P.S. Case No. 132 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T