Satish Prasad @ Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7915 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -295 Year- 2016 Thana -KAJI MUHAMMADPUR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Satish Prasad @ Satish Kumar S/o Late Hira Prasad R/o Village Sakri, Saraiya P.S.Kurhani, District Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dilip Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 295 of 2016 initiated for the offence under Section-420 of the Indian Penal Code.

From the nature of allegation made in the complaint petition which was sent to P.S. u/S 156(3) Cr. P.C., it appears that this is a matter of civil dispute.

Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed it is ordered that the petitioner named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 295 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur subject to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7915 of 2017 (4) dt.12-04-2017 2/2 condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T