Krishnandan Sah @ Krishnand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22214 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2021 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== KRISHNANDAN SAH @ KRISHNAND KUMAR SON OF RAM EKBAL SAH R/O VILLAGE- BHAGWANPUR, P.S.- DHAKA, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar BIHAR 2.

MUNNI DEVI D/O- HASARI LAL SAH R/O VILLAGE- PARSA, P.S.- DHAKA, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Umesh Chandra Verma Mr.Abhishek Kumar For Opposite Party No.2 :

Mr.RajanPramod Kumar Pandey For the State Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 290 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of D.P. Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22214 of 2022(2) dt.20-07-2022 2/3 Both parties are ready to settle the dispute. Without going into the merits of the matter, let the petitioner above named be released on provisional bail for a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order to the court concerned on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 290 of 2021. The court below is directed to make suitable effort for the purpose of conciliation between the parties. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.

If an amicable resolution is worked out within two months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional bail.

If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the Court below, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioner's provisional bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22214 of 2022(2) dt.20-07-2022 3/3 This application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) shahzad/- U T