Satyam Singh @ Satyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42211 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -232 Year- 2016 Thana -LAKHISARAI District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Satyam Singh @ Satyam Kumar son of Late Ganesh Prasad Singh resident of village - Barahiya (Dhanraj Tola), Police Station - Barahiya, District - Lakhisarai.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 399, 402, 307, 353, 332, 333 of the Indian Penal Code and section 25(1-b)A, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation against the accused persons including the petitioner is that they were assembled for committing dacoity but in the meantime, police came and arrested all the accused persons and on being search, one country made pistol along with an empty cartridge and two live cartridges and are said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 14.05.2016. The charge sheet has
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42211 of 2016 (2) dt.04-10-2016 2/2 been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. No one is injured in course of occurrence. One country made pistol with an empty cartridge and two live cartridges are said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of section 100 of the Cr.P.C. It is further submitted that the petitioner may be released on bail, after completion of six months in custody i.e. from 14.05.2016.
On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail after completion of six months in custody i.e. from 14.05.2016, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 232 of 2016.
(Sudhir Singh, J.) Amit/- U T