Md. Nazir Ansari @ Nazir Ansari @ Naziruddin Ansari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19023 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -138 Year- 2016 Thana -AMAUR District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Md. Nazir Ansari @ Nazir Ansari @ Naziruddin Ansari, son of late Habib Ansari.

2. Bibi Furgo, wife of Md. Nazir Ansari @ Nazir Ansari Naziruddin.

3. Nadim Ansari

4. Azim Ansari Sl. Nos. 3 and 4 are sons of Md. Nazir Ansari @ Nazir Ansari @ Naziruddin.

5. Farhat, D/o Md. Nazir Ansari @ Nazir Ansari @ Naziruddin All are resident of village-Basantpur, P.S.-Amaur District-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Amour P.S. Case No. 138 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioners are family members of Md. Imran Ansari who is said to have married with the daughter of the informant. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19023 of 2017 (2) dt.19-05-2017 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 138 of 2016, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IVth, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T