Dara Kha @ Dara Khan @ Gharo Khan @ Alimuddin Khan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9327 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2015 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Dara Kha @ Dara Khan @ Gharo Khan @ Alimuddin Khan and Ors 2.

Jasim Kha @ Md. Jaseem Khan, 3.

Alim Kha @ Alimuddin Khan @ Ghaso Khan, 4.

Mohan Kha @ Mohan Khan, All four are sons of Late Nayeem Khan, Resident of Village- Jaibigha, P.S. Gurua, District- Gaya. 5.

Md. Kamal Kha @ Kamal Khan, Son of Alim Khan, Resident of VillageJaibigha, P.S. Gurua, District- Gaya. 6.

Md. Aarif Kha @ Aarif Khan, Son of Sayed Khan, Resident of VillageTelia, P.S. Aamas, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rashid Izhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present quashing application has been filed seeking quashing of the order taking cognizance.

3. On query of the Court, with regard to the stage of the case presently, the learned counsel submits that the charges have been framed.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that since charges have been framed, that signifies commencement of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9327 of 2017(2) dt.20-09-2023 2/2 trial, as such, the Court, at this stage, should refrain from interfering with the order of cognizance.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to entertain the quashing application.

6. Accordingly, the present quashing application stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T