← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24635/2022allowed

Pratima Devi @ Khushbu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-31Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24635 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2021 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== Pratima Devi @ Khushbu Devi Wife Of Satrughan Prasad R/O VillagePurandarpur Ward No.-02, P.S.- Govindganj, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 324, 307, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner roped in this case only

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24635 of 2022(2) dt.31-08-2022 2/2 on the reason that she is wife of co-accused Satrughan Prasad. There is specific allegation against the husband of the petitioner who threw explosive on the informant. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Govindganj (Malahi) P.S. Case No. 321 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T