Patna High CourtCWJC/24407/2013disposed

Ram Lakhan Das v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-12-07Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24407 of 2013 =========================================================== Ram Lakhan Das Son Of Badri Das Resident Of Village Nargada, P.S. Danapur, Dist. Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union Of India Through The Secretary , Ministry Of Shipping Road Transport And Highways, Brdb, Govt. Of India, B-Wing, 4th Floor, Sena Bhawan, New Delhi

2. Secretary, Ministry Of Shipping , Road Transport And Highways, Govt. Of India, Brdb, B-Wing, 4th Floor, Sena Bhawan, New Delhi

3. Secretary, Ministry Of Defence, (Finance/Boarder Road), South Block, New Delhi

4. Director General , Boarder Roads Organization, Seema Sadak Bhawan, Ring Road, Delhi Cant, New Delhi

5. The Controller Of Defence Accounts, Boarder Roads, Seema Sadak Bhawan, Ring Road, Delhi Cant. New Delhi

6. Chief Engineer (P) Dantak, C/O 99 Apo Guahati, Pin 931056

7. Executive Engineer (Electrical And Mechanical) Nfsg, Officer Commanding , 1056, Field Work Shop, C/O 99 Apo, Guahati, Pin - 931056 .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anshuman Singh, C.G.C. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 07-12-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned Central Government Counsel, is present and draws the attention of the Court to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents no. 4 to 7 in which it has been stated that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and revised pension order has also been issued. In view of there being no reply to the averments made in the counter affidavit, copy of which has been served on learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.24407 of 2013 dt.07-12-2015 2/2 counsel for the petitioner on 07.07.2015 coupled with the fact that nobody appears to press the writ application, the Court can only presume that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Saif/- U