Ajay Paswan @ Badal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.70898 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2018 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ajay Paswan @ Badal Son of Ram Prawesh Paswan Resident of VillageDarweshpur,P.S. Maner,Distt.-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 144 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of Armas Act and Section 4/5 Explosive Substance Act.. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one loaded Katta, two live cartridges and one mobile. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 14.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.70898 of 2018(2) dt.11-12-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar, Aurangabad, in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 144 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/Manoj U T