Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24094/2025dismissed

Budha Paswan @ Gupteshwar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-07Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24094 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2022 Thana- Mehendiya District- Arwal ====================================================== Budha Paswan @ Gupteshwar Paswan, S/o Dilkeshwar Paswan Resident of Village- Bharub, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Mehandiya P.S. Case No. 93 of 2022, registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on 21.08.2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 57922 of 2024. The order dated 21.08.2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 57922 of 2024 reads as under: "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mehandiya P.S. Case No. 93 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, Rs.

56,100 and one mobile phone has been looted from the informant by some unknow criminals.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24094 of 2025(5) dt.07-11-2025 2/2

4. The petitioner has been named in the self inculpatory statement of the one co-accused namely Dinesh Paswan.

5. The petitioner is accused in six more criminal cases of similar and serious nature which includes cases of dacoity and loot.

6. The petitioner is in jail since 19.3.2024.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

9. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same at the earliest."

4. From the report of the Trial Court, it appears that the trial court has framed the charges in the case and summons have been issued to the witnesses.

5. Considering the the aforesaid facts and also the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to review my earlier order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) manish/- U