Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74200/2018bail granted

Dilip Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-14Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.74200 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2018 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Dilip Yadav son of Tuns Yadav, resident of Village- Dahiyari, P.S. Sono, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 161 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/26 of Arms Act. Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol and one mobile from his possession. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to local politics. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Petitioner is in custody since 14.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74200 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Jamui, in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 161 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T