Vinay Sah v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Home Affairs Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1196 of 2014 ====================================================== Vinay Sah Son of Dhruv Sah, Resident of Village Dhabini, P.S. Lauria, District-West Champaran. At present posted as Panchayat Sachiv Bhagwanpur Panchayat in Nautan Block, P.S. Nautan, District West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Home Affairs Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran at Bettiah.

4. The Officer in Charge of Nautan Police Station, in the District of West Champaran.

5. The Deputy Development Commissioners West Champaran at Bettiah cum Chief Executive Officer Jila Parishad, West Champaran.

6. The Block Development Officer, Nautan, P.S. Nautan, District West Champaran.

7. Mr. Anand Kaushal Block Welfare Officer, Nautan, Son of Kaushal Kumar Chaudhary Resident of Katokhar, Post Gola Mubarkpur, P.S. Majhi, District Saran, At present Block Welfare Officer, Nautan, P.S. Nautan, District West Champaran.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 21-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to SC-13 for the State.

The present application has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. of Nautan P.S. Case No. 247 of 2014 lodged against the petitioner and others.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same was unwarranted and in fact erroneous and the petitioner has been unnecessarily and unreasonably made an accused without any legal justification.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1196 of 2014 (2) dt.21-07-2015 2/2 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 3 which discloses that after investigation the police has submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and others in the case which is pending for further action by the Court below.

Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to raise all points available to him including those raised in the present writ application before the Court below at the appropriate stage.

In view of the aforesaid, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, the application stands disposed off as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T