Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1466/2017dismissed

Sumit Kumar Singh @ Monu @ Chawani v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1466 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2015 Thana -HATHUA District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Sumit Kumar Singh @ Monu @ Chawani S/o- Uday Pratap Singh R/o Narai Bandh - Emaliya, P.S.- Sarai Lakahn Singh District- Mau(U.P). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

It has been submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case as the mobile does not belong to the petitioner, however, the police has not made investigation in this regard and the petitioner in judicial custody since 08.08.2016. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the petitioner is accused in large number of cases which appears from paragraph no.3 of this petition itself.

In view of the allegation made in the First Information Report as also considering the fact that the petitioner is accused in large number of criminal cases, I am not inclined to grant bail to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1466 of 2017 (3) dt.02-02-2017 the petitioner. However, the court below is directed to expedite the trial and try to conduct the trial on day-to-day basis. The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj is also directed to ensure production of the witnesses before the court below so that the trial may be concluded within a period of six months. If the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period of six months, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. It is needless to say that the petitioner will cooperate in the trial. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Rishi/- U T