Nikesh Kumar Savri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.259 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5720 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Nikesh Kumar Savri son of Shashi Bhushan Tanti R/o-Purani Bazar Bhughar Mohalla. P.S. and Distt.-Jamui.

2.

Naresh Sah Son of Dahaur Sah Resident of Village- Tariyani, Via-Belsand, P.S. Belsand, District-Sheohar.

3.

Satya Swaroop Samadarshi Son of Motilal Paswan Resident of VillageBouri, Post-Guthani, P.S. Guthani, District-Siwan. 4.

Satya Prakash Gautam Son of Kamleshwar Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Damodar Colony, Sector-A. P.S. Hajipur, District-Hajipur. 5.

Prashant Kumar Son of M.P. Singh Resident of Village- Bankey Bazar, P.S. Bankey Bazar, District-Gaya 6.

Satish Kumar Choudhary Son of Jay Prakash Choudhery R/o-Batraha, Ward no.-25, Near Ranket, P.S.-Saharsa, Distt. Saharsa. 7.

Subodh Kumar Son of Ishwar dhari Rajak At-Roopnagar, P.S. Simariya Khat, Distt.-Begusarai 8.

Manoj Kumar Son of Awadhesh Kumar Singh Resident of Village- South of Law College Ganipur, P.S. Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The Bihar Public Service Commission, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishore, Advocate General Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-08-2020 This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 02.06.2020 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CWJC No.5720/2020 titled as Nikesh Kumar Savri Versus The State of Bihar & Ors., whereby and whereunder the writ

Patna High Court L.P.A No.259 of 2020(7) dt.12-08-2020 2/2 application filed by the Appellants has been dismissed. After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal, reserving liberty to file an application seeking review/recall of the judgment placing on record the entire material, which allegedly the appellants/petitioners were precluded from placing on record before the learned Single Judge in view of the restriction with regard to number of pages to be filed in an application, so imposed by the registry.

Permission is granted.

Appeal was filed within the period of limitation. Learned counsel states that an application for review shall be filed within one week.

As and when the same is filed, the Registry shall place the matter before the appropriate Court in accordance with law. As prayed for, appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/- U