Shiva Ji Arya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.90 of 2004 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3509 of 2000 =========================================================== Shiva Ji Arya, son of Late Shripat Sah, resident of Village Mainatand, P.S. Mainatand, District West Champaran at Bettiah .... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah

2. The Circle Officer, Mainatand, District West Champaran

3. Satrughan Sah, son of Raja Sah, resident of Village and P.S. Mainatand, District West Champaran

4. Triveni Ram, son of Dehi Ram

5. Langer Manjhi, son of Suga Manjhi

6. Banshi Manjhi, son of Bachu Manjhi

7. Mishri Manjhi

8. Jaishree Manjhi

9. Beni Lal Manjhi, 7 to 9 sons of Fuleshwar Manjhi

10. Motor Manjhi, son of Bhola Manjhi

11. Nagina Manjhi, son of Rajdeo Manjhi

12. Jado Lal Sah, son of Banti Sah

13. Gena Ram, son of Late Badri Rama All residents of Village Mainatand, P.S. Mainatand, District West Champaran .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : Mr.

For the Respondents : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) Date: 10-02-2016 In spite of repeated calls no one appeared for the appellant. From the office note, it is apparent that this Letters Patent Appeal stood dismissed against Respondent Nos. 3 to 13 and restoration application was also dismissed. Thus, the appeal, as against the contesting respondents, having been dismissed

Patna High Court LPA No.90 of 2004 dt.10-02-2016 2/2 for default, in our view, the appeal becomes incompetent and is dismissed as such.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/Rajesh/- U